Abstract
The article analyzes the history, development and the content of changes of this institution in the civil court in Uzbekistan. The author concludes that the institution of judicial jurisdiction in the civil courts in a modern form of liquidation and content was formed as a result of the civil court reform of 1961, which took place in the entire Union under the Soviet Union. Until then, the rules of jurisdiction in those countries where Islamic and customary law were in force were not clearly systematized, mainly the answer is applied to the local judicial institutions (judicial system was not complicated). The Civil Procedure Code of the Uzbek Soviet Socialist Republic of 1963 established the rule of territorial jurisdiction, according to it, the application is submitted to the court of the defendant's place of residence, and also the rules of jurisdiction for the trial according to the place where the legal fact was committed, the place where the subject of the dispute is located. Today, the Republic of Uzbekistan has developed territorial (forum domicilii), subject-related and related sullov-related rules as a continuation of this historical development. An article by Contemporary sudlovga tegishlilik outlined the content and essence of the case.
References
Antoun, Richard T. “The Islamic Court, the Islamic Judge, and the Accommodation of Traditions: A Jordanian Case Study.” International Journal of Middle East Studies, vol. 12, no. 4. 1980, Б. – 462. http://www.jstor.org/stable/163129
Лапо, А. М. Формирование и развитие гражданского процессуального законодательства России // Молодой ученый. — 2017. — № 2 (136). — С. 314-317 (Lapo, A. M. Formation and development of civil procedural legislation in Russia // Young scientist. - 2017. - No. 2 (136). — pp. 314-317);
Ерохина Т.П. Некоторые проблемы подсудности в гражданском судопроизводстве. Дисс. Канд. Наук. Саратов. 2004. Б. – 12. Советский гражданский процесс / Под ред. М.К. Трушникова. М., 1989. С. 132. (Боб муаллифи С.Иванова) (Erokhina T.P. Some problems of jurisdiction in civil proceedings. DSc dissertation Saratov. 2004. p. - 12. Soviet civil process / Ed. M.K. Trushnikov. M., 1989. p. 132. (Chapter author S. Ivanova));
Осокина Г.Л. Курс российского гражданского процесса. Томск, 2002. Т.1. С. 383. (Osokina G.L. The course of Russian civil procedure. Tomsk, 2002. Vol.1. p. 383.);
Сборник действующих постановлений Пленума Верховного Суда СССР. 1924-1951 гг. М. 1952. С.232 (Collection of current resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the USSR. 1924-1951 M. 1952. p.232.);
This rule was developed in the law of continental Europe, in particular in France. See:Avenel C. Les enjeux et les impacts de la réforme territoriale sur la mise en oeuvre des politiques sociales // Revue française des affaires sociales. – 2017. – №. 2. Б. – 403.
Dodson, Scott. “Civil Procedure: Plaintiff Personal Jurisdiction and Venue Transfer,” The Judges’ Book: Vol. 4, Article 6. 2020. Б. – 24.
Султанов А.Р. Жажда справедливости: борьба за суд. – М.: Статут, 2014. – 304 с. Б. – 185. (Sultanov A.R. Thirst for justice: the struggle for justice. - M.: Statute, 2014. - 304 p. p. - 185.);
Васьковский Е.В. Курс гражданского процесса: Субъекты и объекты процесса, процессуальные отношения и действия. – М.: Статут, 2016. Б. – 484. (Vaskovsky E.V. Civil process course: Subjects and objects of the process, procedural relations and actions. - M.: Statute, 2016. p. - 484.);
Bittighofer, Andreas M. Der internationale Gerichtsstand des Vermögens: eine rechtsvergleichende Studie zur Zuständigkeit deutscher Gerichte aufgrund inländischer Vermögensbelegenheit. Lang, 1994. p. – 393.
Васьковский Е.В. Курс гражданского процесса: Субъекты и объекты процесса, процессуальные отношения и действия. – М.: Статут, 2016. Б. – 494. (Vaskovsky E.V. Civil process course: Subjects and objects of the process, procedural relations and actions. - M.: Statute, 2016. P. - 494.);
See German Civil Procedure Code https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_zpo/index.html
Васьковский Е.В. Курс гражданского процесса: Субъекты и объекты процесса, процессуальные отношения и действия. – М.: Статут, 2016. Б. – 495. (Vaskovsky E.V. Civil process course: Subjects and objects of the process, procedural relations and actions. - M.: Statute, 2016. P. - 495.);